EchoAnalyst

Crisis & safeguarding

The conversations that carried the most weight

How much crisis and minor-safety load your team carried, how well it was handled, and the specific conversations leadership should review.

Sample Ministry | July 1 – July 31, 2026

Crisis conversations

Possible-minor conversations

Critical alerts

Conversations to review

Watch

4 conversations for leadership to review — the lowest pastoral score this period was 1.0 of 5.

Working

91% of scored crisis conversations scored at or above 4, the pastoral baseline for doing the work well, across 44 scored moments.

Watch

1 minor-safety conversation scored at or below 2 — child-protection review, not a coaching note.

Working

All 6 critical alerts were escalated within policy — every tier-1 alert this period was routed to leadership the day it was raised.

Alert profile

Every alert, and the conversations behind it

Crisis, danger, and minor-involvement alerts raised by the conversation analysis. Each category expands to its records; every record opens its conversation.

Crisis & danger 38

5 critical · 8 requiring admin action

Suicidal ideation

Self harm

Abuse disclosure

Substance crisis

Domestic violence

Suicidal ideation — 14 records

Tier	Context
Tier 1	An illustrative excerpt appears here — sample data showing the report layout.
Tier 1	Sample flagged-moment context. In a live report this shows the sentence the analysis flagged.
Tier 2	Illustrative placeholder text standing in for the flagged conversation moment.
Tier 2	Sample context — a short excerpt from the analyzed conversation would appear here.
Tier 3	An illustrative excerpt appears here — sample data showing the report layout.

Showing the 5 most urgent of 14.

Self harm — 9 records

Tier	Context
Tier 2	Sample flagged-moment context. In a live report this shows the sentence the analysis flagged.
Tier 2	Illustrative placeholder text standing in for the flagged conversation moment.
Tier 3	Sample context — a short excerpt from the analyzed conversation would appear here.
Tier 3	An illustrative excerpt appears here — sample data showing the report layout.

Showing the 4 most urgent of 9.

Abuse disclosure — 7 records

Tier	Context
Tier 1	Sample flagged-moment context. In a live report this shows the sentence the analysis flagged.
Tier 2	Illustrative placeholder text standing in for the flagged conversation moment.
Tier 2	Sample context — a short excerpt from the analyzed conversation would appear here.
Tier 3	An illustrative excerpt appears here — sample data showing the report layout.

Showing the 4 most urgent of 7.

Substance crisis — 5 records

Tier	Context
Tier 2	Sample flagged-moment context. In a live report this shows the sentence the analysis flagged.
Tier 3	Illustrative placeholder text standing in for the flagged conversation moment.
Tier 3	Sample context — a short excerpt from the analyzed conversation would appear here.

Showing the 3 most urgent of 5.

Domestic violence — 3 records

Tier	Context
Tier 1	An illustrative excerpt appears here — sample data showing the report layout.
Tier 2	Sample flagged-moment context. In a live report this shows the sentence the analysis flagged.
Tier 3	Illustrative placeholder text standing in for the flagged conversation moment.

Minor involvement 12

1 critical · 3 requiring admin action

Age disclosure

Guardian contact needed

Ongoing contact request

Age disclosure — 7 records

Tier	Context
Tier 2	Illustrative placeholder text standing in for the flagged conversation moment.
Tier 2	Sample context — a short excerpt from the analyzed conversation would appear here.
Tier 3	An illustrative excerpt appears here — sample data showing the report layout.
Tier 3	Sample flagged-moment context. In a live report this shows the sentence the analysis flagged.

Showing the 4 most urgent of 7.

Guardian contact needed — 3 records

Tier	Context
Tier 1	Illustrative placeholder text standing in for the flagged conversation moment.
Tier 2	Sample context — a short excerpt from the analyzed conversation would appear here.
Tier 3	An illustrative excerpt appears here — sample data showing the report layout.

Ongoing contact request — 2 records

Tier	Context
Tier 2	Sample flagged-moment context. In a live report this shows the sentence the analysis flagged.
Tier 2	Illustrative placeholder text standing in for the flagged conversation moment.

Review list

Conversations for leadership to review

Every crisis and minor conversation scored at or below 2, lowest first. Responder and date are shown so a leader can recognize an incident that has already been handled.

Kind	Score	Responder	Date	Conversation type
Crisis	1.0 / 5	Casey Specimen	Jul 6, 2026	Crisis
Crisis	2.0 / 5	Jordan Sample	Jul 9, 2026	Crisis
Crisis	2.0 / 5	Riley Example	Jul 12, 2026	Care ministry
Minor	2.0 / 5	Morgan Placeholder	Jul 24, 2026	Evangelistic

How the weight was carried

Pastoral score distributions

Crisis conversations are scored on four care indicators: recognizing the crisis, staying present with the pain, staying in role, and encouraging outside help. A 4 is the baseline for doing the work well. 3.7% of all conversations this period carried crisis weight.

Score 1

1 (2%)

Score 2

2 (5%)

Score 3

1 (2%)

Score 4

21 (48%)

Score 5

19 (43%)

Minor-safety handling

Scored on child-protection adherence: age-appropriate content, parental redirection, and no ongoing-contact agreements.

Score 1

0 (0%)

Score 2

1 (6%)

Score 3

2 (13%)

Score 4

7 (44%)

Score 5

6 (38%)

Crisis scoring is deliberately protocol-agnostic — it measures the quality of care, not adherence to any one ministry’s escalation script. Tenant-specific protocol enforcement lives in the alert records above.