Sample data — illustrative numbers. Every name, quote and figure on this page is fictional.
EchoAnalyst
Channel & source effectiveness

Where the next outreach dollar works hardest

Every channel and every source — campaign, page, and number seekers arrive through — compared on volume, quality, movement, and coverage.

Sample Ministry | July 1 – July 31, 2026
1,284
Conversations
▲ 106 vs prior period
7
Active sources
WhatsApp
Best channel
Sample Ministry WhatsApp line
Best source
Best movement
Sample Ministry WhatsApp line — the source with the most spiritual movement
44%
of seekers showed spiritual movement
At a glance

Effectiveness by channel

How each communication channel performs — where seekers engage, move, and get answered.

Channel Conversations Avg score Movement Prayer offered Avg first reply Came back
WhatsApp 412 (32.1%) 4.1 44% · 356 conv 61% 2m 46%
Facebook Messenger 318 (24.8%) 4.0 39% · 268 conv 57% 3m 42%
Web chat 247 (19.2%) 4.2 36% · 201 conv 53% 47s 39%
SMS 158 (12.3%) 3.9 33% · 122 conv 49% 3m 37%
Instagram 96 (7.5%) 3.8 28% · 74 conv 45% 4m 31%
Phone 53 (4.1%) 4.3 33% · 40 conv 66% 12s 43%

“Came back” is the share of seekers with another analyzed conversation afterwards — a floor, since seekers who can’t be matched across visits aren’t counted.

Source by source

Effectiveness by source

Every page, account, and number seekers arrive through. The highlighted row leads the ministry on movement.

Source Channel Conversations Avg score Movement Professions Missed chats
Sample Ministry WhatsApp lineBest movement WhatsApp 412 (32%) 4.1 44% · 356 conv 24 3%
Facebook Page — Sample Ministry Facebook Messenger 318 (25%) 4.0 39% · 268 conv 14 5%
sampleministry.example.org chat widget Web chat 189 (15%) 4.2 37% · 154 conv 9 8%
Main SMS short code (sample) SMS 158 (12%) 3.9 33% · 122 conv 5 4%
Instagram @sampleministry Instagram 96 (8%) 3.8 28% · 74 conv 1 12%
Prayer landing page (sample) Web chat 58 (5%) 4.4 34% · 47 conv 4 7%
Care line (sample) Phone 53 (4%) 4.3 33% · 40 conv 1 9%

Best-channel and best-source highlights need at least 20 movement-tracked conversations, and ranking accounts for sample size (Wilson lower bound) — so a perfect rate on a handful of conversations can't outrank a proven source.

Campaigns

Effectiveness by campaign

What each marketing campaign produced, from UTM tracking. Web chat, web forms, and Facebook ad referrals carry campaign data; conversations arriving without it (most texting and social channels) are not counted here.

Campaign Conversations Avg score Movement Professions Missed chats
summer-hope-2026 (sample) 84 (7%) 4.3 42% · 71 conv 6 5%
vbs-invite (sample) 47 (4%) 4.1 36% · 39 conv 3 8%
search-brand (sample) Low sample 31 (2%) 4.0 33% · 18 conv 1 9%

Movement comparisons are associations, not proof of cause.